core measures

edited May 2016 in CDI Talk Archive
Our VP of Nursing is hinting around to our director that maybe the CDI team should take over the responsibility for core measures. I would appreciate input from my colleagues if you are doing this or did it in the past? I heard from a neighboring CDI specialist, they did it for awhile but did not get to all of the records fast enough for some of the standards e.g. ASA within 24 hrs of an MI. If you are doing this, do you have just a piece of it or the whole responsibility? I recall from a demonstration that JA Thomas has a specific module for this built into their software, do other systems have the same?
Do I sound a little panicky how to pull this off??!! :) I am 'invited' to a meeting Monday afternoon to present our view and would be forever grateful for some insight into developing a process.

Thank you very much - Linnea


Linnea Thennes, RN, BS, CCDS
Supervisor, Clinical Documentation Improvement
Centegra Health System
815. 759-8193
lthennes@centegra.com



Comments

  • edited May 2016
    This is one of those shaky areas where we as CDI folks have MUCH to contribute, but we should not be RESPONSIBLE for it. One of the main impediments is what you mentioned, most of the time we do not get to the chart fast enough to review for core measures and to ensure that the interventions are done.

    That being said, our contribution as CDIs is very valuable: I include core measure reminders on all my Progress Note Queries for Core Measure Diagnoses, I include Core Measure information in every presentation I do, I always include Core Measures when I chat with Physicians and other staff. Without the dedicated staff to focus on Core Measure Diagnoses first, and certainly without an automated process where charts with Core Measure Diagnoses are pre-identified and flagged for you; I just do not see how CDI can be responsible for it over a Quality Department.

    Kindest Regards,

    Mark



    Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP
    Clinical Documentation Excellence
    Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
    Sibley Memorial Hospital

    Information Technology
    5255 Loughboro Rd NW
    Washington DC, 20016-2695

    W: 202.660.6782
    F: 202.537.4477
    mdominesey@sibley.org
    [cid:image001.gif@01CD29F5.3942FC30]
    http://www.sibley.org

  • If/when we see that core measures have not been initiated for a patient
    meeting the criteria, we will gently remind the RN staff to review the
    chart and consider implementing the Core Measure Process - however, Core
    Measures is not one of our prime duties. We are understaffed and we do
    not see all cases with a 24 hour period. I think CDI staff 'could'
    perform Core Measures, but only if allowances would be made in terms of
    staffing and work flow.







    Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS



    Supervisor, Clinical Documentation Integrity, Quality Department

    California Pacific Medical Center

    2351 Clay #243

    San Francisco, CA 94115

    Cell: 415.637.9002

    Fax: 415.600.1325

    Ofc: 415.600.3739

    evanspx@sutterhealth.org

  • edited May 2016
    I agree here. I review the chart and if I see a core measure that was
    not addressed, I will query, but it's not on my "to do" list. Quality
    follows those here. I consider myself a helper with regard to this.



    Robert



    Robert S. Hodges, BSN, MSN, RN, CCDS

    Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist

    Aleda E. Lutz VAMC

    Mail Code 136

    1500 Weiss Street

    Saginaw MI 48602



    P: 989-497-2500 x13101

    F: 989-321-4912

    E: Robert.Hodges2@va.gov



    "We are dealing with Veterans, not procedures; With their problems, not
    ours." --General Omar Bradley



  • edited May 2016
    Agree with Mark! The measures are too picky... and we would get bogged down with reviewing and following up on each piece. We do things much like Mark's team as well. We also are getting ready to implement a "Reminder" to do the Core Measure at the bottom of our query template that involves each measure. WAY too much if you want both done RIGHT and CONCURRENTLY... (unless you add more staff... it will take so much away from your program!) I think that sounds like a good Nursing Leadership project, which should be owned by either nursing or dedicated quality reviewers. Good luck!

    Vicki S. Davis, RN CDS
    Clinical Documentation Improvement Manager
    Health Information Management Department
    Alamance Regional Medical Center
    Office (336) 586-3765
    Ascom Mobile (336) 586-4191
    Fax (336) 538-7428
    vdavis2@armc.com

    "The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug."- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

  • edited May 2016
    Mark, Paul & Robert's comments are spot on.

    I'll emphasize again, be careful about having this as ANYTHING more than a task where you agree to help out. If it becomes a core responsibility (even if shared) and/or high priority, will have an impact on workflow, productivity, etc. Very likely to see declines in CDI metrics. Would absolutely need to explore what this would mean as far as staffing levels.

    Finally, there would also need to be some solid education -- active abstracting for core measures is quite different from CDI (passive abstracting from the documentation). There is a given & firm set of definitions that need to be complied with (and understood). There is not the requirement to rely on physician documentation. In fact, there will be cases that identify for core measures that will not be reflected in the final coding data base. The reverse is also true. Two primary examples that we've encountered are VAPs and CAUTIs. Physicians with VAP in particular document a link where the quality staff rule out the VAP based on their definition. The opposite is often the case for CAUTIs, the physician doesn't establish the link but quality scores as a CAUTI.

    Don

  • edited May 2016
    We just had a similar discussion here last week. Having been the Clinical Coordinator for Cardiac Core Measures for 3 years prior to moving into my CDI position, I am well aware of the responsibilities of both areas. You would certainly need to hire additional FTE's, as your review process would be much more involved. CDI nurses can definitely contribute to the process, but I don't believe we should 'own' it. We do not do 100% review, and so there are charts we would miss. We determined that our CDI nurses will initiate a 'Core Measures consult' to our QI team when we review a chart that has CHF, MI, etc..

    Vivian

  • edited May 2016
    I totally agree with the responses to date. It is too big a job, and too important to the hospital, to try to fit it in existing workloads or staffing. We do "assist" with core measures in a limited manner, but do not "own" the process. Our primary focus is being sure that the quality plan in the EMR has been activated for nursing follow thru. Kim

    Kim Digardi, RN
    Documentation Integrity Specialist
    St. Helena Hospital
    10 Woodland Road
    St. Helena, CA 94574

    Phone: 707.967.5936
    Email: digardsk@ah.org

  • edited May 2016
    I agree w/Mark. We help, by identifying records that we see that quality needs to see, by speaking w/physicians about needed documentation, but we are not responsible. I think it would be very difficult to focus on responsibilities for all of it.

    Sharon Cole, RN, CCDS
    Providence Health Center
    Case Management Dept
    254.751.4256
    srcole@phn-waco.org

  • edited May 2016
    Currently the CDS's DO NOT do core measures- we have a QI team who do that & were trained to use a portion of our current software in JA Thomas, I don't think we (hospital) purchased the QI module. Doing the QI stuff would certainly dilute my effectiveness / financial impact if I were to add it to current duties- good luck with your conversation.

    Sally Lamberson, RN
    Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Case Management and Discharge Planning
    Direct: 303-938-3352
    [cid:image001.jpg@01CD2A01.0FB50D70]


  • edited May 2016
    As with the idea of combining case management and CDI, I think the idea
    of distracting from the very detailed and labor intensive work that a
    CDS has to do is not a good idea. The fact that you are "in the chart"
    does not justify reducing your effectiveness both for reimbursement and
    SOI/ROM.

    Donna

    Donna Kent, RN, BSN, CCDS
    Manager, Clinical Documentation Integrity Program
    Clinical Quality and Accreditation
    Torrance Memorial Medical Center
    ph.:310 784-6884 fax:310 784-6899
    donna.kent@tmmc.com
  • edited May 2016
    I agree with Mark and Vicki. I, too, include Core Measures in my physician =
    =20
    presentation, in one on one conversations with physicians and in=20
    educational posters. However, it is not the responsibility of a CDI nurse =
    to review=20
    for Quality Measures. There is enough for the CDI nurses to review in just=
    =20
    capturing the most appropriate severity of illness and risk of mortality.

Sign In or Register to comment.