"Due to" and "Secondary to"

I believe I was taught that when a condition is secondary to or due to another you code that diagnosis as principal.
Ex/ Weakness due to hyponatremia
or Acute Respiratory Failure secondary to Ex COPD.

Specifically, in the case of the Ac Resp Failure, I understand when two or more diagnoses meet the definition... but it is the linking that is causing me to believe that the Ex COPD should be the primary.

Oh, knowledgeable CDIs & Coders please advise!
Also, some credible reference would be appreciated!
Thanks!

Charrington "Charlie" Morell

Comments

  • edited May 2016
    Since I am not a coder, I have difficulty citing...But for a patient with Acute resp failure and Ex of COPD, we would code the resp failure as primary as that is the more acute situation.
    Hope this helps!!!

    Judi Bates RN, BSN, CCDS
    Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
    CDI Specialist
    856-757-3161
    Beeper 66x2906
  • It is that "gray" area again right! The coders always use "DUE TO" when citing why they coded something a certain way...but that doesn't apply to Acute Resp Failure DUE TO COPD exacerbation, as both the coder and the CDI would be more apt to code the Acute resp failure-right??

    Juli Bovard RN CCDS
    Rapid City Regional Hospital
  • Its definitely true when you are talking about signs and symptoms secondary to a defined dx. Ex: "chest pain 2/2 MI" or "weakness 2/2 hyponatremia. However, I don’t think that carries over all the time. For example if a pat presented with a pleural effusion 2/2 cirrhosis or an underlying cardiac issue, I think you could use the effusion as primary.

    I'll be honest that I am not totally clear on this and would love to hear opinions from the coders in the group.

    Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
    Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
    AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
    Flagstaff Medical Center
    Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
    Cell: 928.814.9404
  • edited May 2016
    I believe the rule is when it is a symptom followed by a "due to" diagnosis then you use the diagnosis. When it is a diagnosis followed by a diagnosis then you can choose either (with some exceptions regarding POA and body systems). However; if it is sepsis due to a diagnosis then you use sepsis (because sepsis is a systemic illness and captures the "due to").


    Megan Barton RN, BSN
    Manager Clinical Documentation Improvement
    Health Information Management-Mercy East
    Ph: 314-251-6192
    Fx: 314-251-3982
  • edited May 2016
    I looked up Sepsis (995.91), Severe Sepsis (995.92) and SIRS (995.93 &995.94) in the ICD-9-CM manual and it states "Code first underlying infection (or condition in the case of SIRS)". I've talked to the coders here in the past and they have said that is correct.

    "Faye Brown's ICD-9-CM Coding Handbook 2012" says:

    - "Assign first the code for the underlying systemic infection followed by the code for Sepsis or Severe Sepsis. When there is an underlying localized infection (e.g. pneumonia, cellulitis, or nonspecific urinary tract infection) with sepsis, severe sepsis, or SIRS: Assign a code for the systemic infection first..."

    -"Sepsis or severe sepsis as the principal diagnosis, with the initiating event being a noninfectious condition: Assign first the code for the systemic infection and sepsis codes before the noninfectious condition."

    "Associated noninfectious condition and sepsis or severe sepsis both meet the definition of principal diagnosis; either may be sequenced as the principal diagnosis."

    I hope this helps.

    Robert

    Robert S. Hodges, BSN, MSN, RN, CCDS
    Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
    Aleda E. Lutz VAMC
    Mail Code 136
    1500 Weiss Street
    Saginaw MI 48602
    P: 989-497-2500 x13101
    F: 989-321-4912
    E: Robert.Hodges2@va.gov
     
    “Patriotism is easy to understand in America; it means looking out for yourself by looking out for your country" Calvin Coolidge
  • edited May 2016
    Charlie,

    This is definitely a grey area. First, there are numerous coding guidelines and coding clinics that instruct coders for assignment of conditions "due to" or "secondary to". DM, Sepsis, Respiratory Failure, HIV come to mind.
    Secondly, coding guidelines instruct us "Codes for symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions Codes for symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions from Chapter 16 are not to be used as principal diagnosis when a related definitive diagnosis has been established." Also, would keep in mind UHDDS definition of principal diagnosis “that condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care.”


    Respiratory failure and congestive heart failure
          Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2005 Page: 5 Effective with discharges: April 20, 2005
    Example 3:

    A patient arrived in the hospital in acute respiratory failure. The patient was intubated and admitted to the hospital. The patient also has congestive heart failure. The physician documents acute respiratory failure as the reason for admission.


    Principal diagnosis:
    518.81 Acute respiratory failure

    Secondary diagnosis:
    428.0 Congestive heart failure, unspecified


    In this example, the physician documented the acute respiratory failure as the reason for admission, therefore 518.81 was listed as the principal diagnosis. Selection of the principal diagnosis is governed by the circumstances of admission. If the documentation is unclear regarding whether the congestive heart failure or the acute respiratory failure was the reason for admission, coders should query the physician.

    I think the most important questions to ask is what occasioned the admission, what is focus of treatment and what do my coding guidelines say regarding sequencing.

    Hope this helps.


    Dorie Douthit, RHIT,CCS
    ddouthit@stmarysathens.org
    CDI Program/HIM
  • I would agree, there is not a specific guideline which instructs you how to code "due to" for "secondary to".
  • edited May 2016
    This is what we generally default to when assigning those types of DRG's… We joke around here that it is hard not to do the "DUE TO, DUE TO THING…" those PDx assignments drive us crazy‼! Would like to hear other opinions or examples… Always good to have a check and balance…

    • Treat every case individually, review all of the documentation, then check the coding guidelines and chapter specific rules. This is what we generally remember when assigning the DRG…

    • Symptom CODES that are due an underlying conditions go to the underlying condition, unless the differential/"vs"/"and" rules apply.

    • Respiratory failure can be a standalone diagnosis or be secondary diagnosis. Resp failure is ALWAYS due to something. It still has its own DRG.. you have to look at what occasioned the admit. I also use a little clinical prioritizing with Resp Failure due to COPD exacerbations-COPD exacerbations are not always in-patient, but Acute Respiratory failure should be.... We have had several HIA Audit reviews that substantiate the use of Resp Failure as principal in the COPD cases. In the cases with CHF and Resp Failure, I look to see if they were related, linked, equally treated and optimize the DRG, if possible.

    • Sepsis-if the admit was occasioned by the INFECTION with Sepsis-then Sepsis should be your principal (unless a catheter related infection). Don't forget to check for a vent over 96 hours with Sepsis as Pdx…since that changes the DRG/

    If the patient came in with an MI and they were septic from Pneumonia-then what occasioned the admission? Our conclusion: If Infection/Sepsis was not the focal point or what truly would have bought the bed, and there is no chapter specific guideline-you should be able to use MI as the Pdx. I would go with the MI in this case....

    Ex: Admitted with Cp x 4 days, n/v, elevated troponins, Inferior lateral MI on EKG with known CAD, NTG gtt started, Morphine IV given. Pt has also had pneumonia for one week prior to admission and was treated with po abx, however the pneumonia has not improved much. The patient may have early sepsis related to pneumonia, start IV abx. Will consult cardiology for heart cath and possible stenting once stable."


    ☺ -V

    Vicki S. Davis, RN CDS
    Clinical Documentation Improvement Manager
    Health Information Management Department
    Alamance Regional Medical Center
    Office (336) 586-3765
    Ascom Mobile (336) 586-4191
    Fax (336) 538-7428
    vdavis2@armc.com

    "The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug."- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
  • edited May 2016
    Realize this is a late response to email below but I have been off for 5 days (lucky me!). The following are from the coding guidelines for the years noted.


    Chapter 8: Respiratory system diseases coding guidelines 10/01/2008
          Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2008 Page: 241 to 244 Effective with discharges: October 1, 2008
    Acute Respiratory Failure

    1) Acute respiratory failure as principal diagnosis

    Code 518.81, Acute respiratory failure, may be assigned as a principal diagnosis when it is the condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission to the hospital, and the selection is supported by the Alphabetic Index and Tabular List. However, chapter-specific coding guidelines (such as obstetrics, poisoning, HIV, newborn) that provide sequencing direction take precedence.

    2) Acute respiratory failure as secondary diagnosis

    Respiratory failure may be listed as a secondary diagnosis if it occurs after admission, or if it is present on admission, but does not meet the definition of principal diagnosis.

    3) Sequencing of acute respiratory failure and another acute condition

    When a patient is admitted with respiratory failure and another acute condition, (e.g., myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, aspiration pneumonia), the principal diagnosis will not be the same in every situation. This applies whether the other acute condition is a respiratory or nonrespiratory condition. Selection of the principal diagnosis will be dependent on the circumstances of admission. If both the respiratory failure and the other acute condition are equally responsible for occasioning the admission to the hospital, and there are no chapter-specific sequencing rules, the guideline regarding two or more diagnoses that equally meet the definition for principal diagnosis (Section II, C.) may be applied in these situations.

    If the documentation is not clear as to whether acute respiratory failure and another condition are equally responsible for occasioning the admission, query the provider for clarification.

    Chapter 8: Diseases of Respiratory System
          Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2011 Pages: 189-190 Effective with discharges: October 1, 2011

    c. Acute Respiratory Failure

    1) Acute respiratory failure as principal diagnosis

    Code 518.81, Acute respiratory failure, may be assigned as a principal diagnosis when it is the condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission to the hospital, and the selection is supported by the Alphabetic Index and Tabular List. However, chapter-specific coding guidelines (such as obstetrics, poisoning, HIV, newborn) that provide sequencing direction take precedence.

    Sharon Salinas, CCS
    Barlow Respiratory Hospital
    213-250-4200 Extension 3336
Sign In or Register to comment.