"Distributive Shock"
I work directly for the Chief Medical Information Officer at my hospital. We discussed shock, hypotension, and the use of pressors in a post surgical patient.
In our discussion about the use of pressors in the ICU for post-surgical patients, he agrees that if a patient is on Levophed (Norepinephrine), then the patient has something more serious than "hypotension". He states that a patient with this type of shock is best described as one in "Distributive Shock". He states that the cause of this type of shock in a post-surgical patient is mostly likely due to vasodilation where the volume to fill becomes greater, thus, blood pressure drops. Levophed is used to help constrict the blood vessels and helps increase the blood pressure. Further, he describes this as "Distributive Shock due to a SIRS response from the stress of surgery".
Should this type of shock be clarified to "Post-operative shock" - 998.00? When using the most prevalent encoder, the logic tree takes you this way: Shock--> Surgical/Postoperative --> post-operative shock. This is a CC diagnosis. Or considering that this type of shock is caused by a SIRS response, should it be coded 785.52 - Septic shock even though an infection did not cause it.
Ok, what about when something happens because of the hypotension? What if the "shock" caused Kidney Injury (AKI caused by hypotension is usually ATN). Then we are talking "organ damage" caused by the shock. Do we just code the organ damage and the shock as separate codes? In Septic Shock, the Septic Shock "stacks" on top of "Sepsis" or "Severe Sepsis" offering an additional MCC on top of the one for the Sepsis diagnosis.
Thanks so much
Mark
Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Excellence
Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Information Technology
5255 Loughboro Rd NW
Washington DC, 20016-2695
W: 202.660.6782
F: 202.537.4477
mdominesey@sibley.org
http://www.sibley.org
In our discussion about the use of pressors in the ICU for post-surgical patients, he agrees that if a patient is on Levophed (Norepinephrine), then the patient has something more serious than "hypotension". He states that a patient with this type of shock is best described as one in "Distributive Shock". He states that the cause of this type of shock in a post-surgical patient is mostly likely due to vasodilation where the volume to fill becomes greater, thus, blood pressure drops. Levophed is used to help constrict the blood vessels and helps increase the blood pressure. Further, he describes this as "Distributive Shock due to a SIRS response from the stress of surgery".
Should this type of shock be clarified to "Post-operative shock" - 998.00? When using the most prevalent encoder, the logic tree takes you this way: Shock--> Surgical/Postoperative --> post-operative shock. This is a CC diagnosis. Or considering that this type of shock is caused by a SIRS response, should it be coded 785.52 - Septic shock even though an infection did not cause it.
Ok, what about when something happens because of the hypotension? What if the "shock" caused Kidney Injury (AKI caused by hypotension is usually ATN). Then we are talking "organ damage" caused by the shock. Do we just code the organ damage and the shock as separate codes? In Septic Shock, the Septic Shock "stacks" on top of "Sepsis" or "Severe Sepsis" offering an additional MCC on top of the one for the Sepsis diagnosis.
Thanks so much
Mark
Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Excellence
Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Information Technology
5255 Loughboro Rd NW
Washington DC, 20016-2695
W: 202.660.6782
F: 202.537.4477
mdominesey@sibley.org
http://www.sibley.org
Comments
AKI is a stand-alone diagnosis, regardless of cause.
Hope that helps.
Renee
Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS, CDIP
Karen Maritano, R. N.
Clinical Documentation Specialist
Legacy Health
Portland, Oregon
503-413-7154
The entire contents of this email communication (including any subsequent email communication attaching, responding to or discussing the subject email communication) is privileged pursuant to ORS 41.675 and 41.685, RCW 4.24.250 and 70.41.200, the federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, and other applicable law.
Renee
Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS, CDIP