Querying for SOI/ROM
Hello everyone,
Our CDS/coding team met recently, and the issue of using an encoder/grouper to determine if a query will make a difference in the SOI/ROM was raised. The possibility of not placing the query if it didn't change DRG, add CC/MCC or increase SOI/ROM was discussed, as those would be considered "nuisance" queries.
I remember when I started performing CDI in 2008 that the focus was for integrity of the record, completeness, and specificity. Also, shouldn't the CDI program be compliant, and if you are only looking to increase $$, is that really totally compliant?
Yes, we all want to show the success of our CDI program & efforts, but it just feels like something is being lost here if we HAVE to use the encoder/grouper to determine possible change, and only then to place a query.
I'd really be interested in your thoughts? And am I just being "old fashioned"?
thanks very much,
Becky Mann, RN, CDS
Sutter Solano Medical Center
Our CDS/coding team met recently, and the issue of using an encoder/grouper to determine if a query will make a difference in the SOI/ROM was raised. The possibility of not placing the query if it didn't change DRG, add CC/MCC or increase SOI/ROM was discussed, as those would be considered "nuisance" queries.
I remember when I started performing CDI in 2008 that the focus was for integrity of the record, completeness, and specificity. Also, shouldn't the CDI program be compliant, and if you are only looking to increase $$, is that really totally compliant?
Yes, we all want to show the success of our CDI program & efforts, but it just feels like something is being lost here if we HAVE to use the encoder/grouper to determine possible change, and only then to place a query.
I'd really be interested in your thoughts? And am I just being "old fashioned"?
thanks very much,
Becky Mann, RN, CDS
Sutter Solano Medical Center
Comments
I agree with your sentiment that our purpose should be to focus upon the integrity of the record.
I personally will sometimes initiate a query knowing as I do so that the DRG and APR/ROM have reached the highest possible scale and a positive response to my query will impact neither the current DRG or ROM - BUT, it may impact the 'next' case, even if I don't review the chart.
(The thought is that if I query for 'acute respiratory failure' for the patient with Sepsis due to PNA with ATN, the responding MD may better accept a query for the 'next record' or, even better, he or she may spontaneously document the more compliant and precise term of acute respiratory failure rather than insufficiency IF the patient meets criteria for acute respiratory failure
So, it is a bit complicated - however, from the stand point of compliance and also to acknowledge our role as documentation specialist, I think we should query judiciously for 'significant' conditions and use these as teaching points. I believe we strengthen the integrity of a CDI program if we query in such circumstances. (We label such cases as "educational' in Midas - meaning we used a form citing the current definition of acute renal failure, as one example, and the MD agreed with the query and subsequently documented 'acute renal failure' rather than insufficiency").
We each have to weigh the time this requires of the CDI team and then query judiciously while also respecting the time of the physician while keeping in mind we 'could query every chart almost every time'.
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
San Francisco, CA 94107
Cell: 415.637.9002
Fax: 415.600.1325
Ofc: 415.600.3739
evanspx@sutterhealth.org
Donna
Donna Kent, RN, BSN, CCDS
Manager, Clinical Documentation Integrity Program
Clinical Quality and Accreditation
Torrance Memorial Medical Center
ph.:310 784-6884 fax:310 784-6899
donna.kent@tmmc.com
We all have to remember that we will be called on to educate and query the physicians to ICD-10 standards in the near future, now is as good a time as any to start.
An experienced CDI Specialist does not place "nuisance queries"; if that is a feature of the culture at your place, it really begs for adjustment through greater acceptance by the docs, having your exec team champion your program, and having the queries audited / 2nd review on a regular basis to ensure that the CDI Specialist is only querying when clinically indicated.
It IS quality, completeness, compliance, and take-back protection as much as it is reimbursement (and I argue that the reimbursement is a DISTANT second to the reasons stated).
Then again: if you query for severity, risk, and quality, the reimbursement WILL follow!
Mark
Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP
Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Information Technology
5255 Loughboro Rd NW
Washington DC, 20016-2695
W: 202.660.6782
http://www.sibley.org
mdominesey@sibley.org
Donna
Donna Kent, RN, BSN,
... quality ... completeness ... education ... paint the whole picture ...
There are operational choices that may need to be made, but NOT policy choices.
RAC is here; ICD-10 is coming; VBP is starting; Bundling is just down the road; etc....
"nuisance" queries --
I suspect many programs have some aspect of that perception to deal with -- culture change takes years, so as Winston Churchill is quoted:
Never give in.
Never, never, never, never--in nothing, great or small, large or petty--never give in, except to convictions of honor and good sense.
Never yield to force.
Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.
Simply add my voice to the "sense of the professional community"
Don
Tracy M Peyton RN, CCDS
Bradford Regional Medical Center
Upper Allegany Health Systems
116 Interstate Parkway
Bradford, PA 16701
814-558-0406
One point I try to make with the financial side of the house (CFO) is that it could be considered 'cherry picking' (and non-compliant) to:
1. Audit 'only' Medicare
2. Place a query 'only' when one expects a positive ROI
I know a CDI program is expected (officially or unofficially) pay for its existence, but still, we risk loss of credibility if we don't query for the sake of quality.
I don't think some of the CFOs understand the other pressures we face - it is 'good' to show a ROI, and I think any CDI program that compliantly results in more precise documentation will benefit the quality metrics as well as the CMI.
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
Query for SOI/ROM regardless and the money follows. Don't have the physicians think they only need to be clear and specific in certain cases - they won't ever get to auto pilot!
St. Helena Hospital Napa Valley is Top in the West:
Patients rated St. Helena Hospital Napa Valley
higher than any other of its size in the western US
according to surveys conducted by NRC Picker.
Learn more at http://TopintheWest.org
nah, too much education and change management to do!
MND
Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Excellence
Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Information Technology
5255 Loughboro Rd NW
Washington DC, 20016-2695
W: 202.660.6782
F: 202.537.4477
mdominesey@sibley.org
http://www.sibley.org
As you said, the mountain is just too high...and then "THEY" would just change the rules -- AGAIN!!
Besides, we've all seen where someone says -- "have CDI do that" (because CDI is effective, because CDI has the relationships, because CDS have such a unique knowledge, personality & skill sets...)
Don
Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Excellence
Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Information Technology
5255 Loughboro Rd NW
Washington DC, 20016-2695
W: 202.660.6782
F: 202.537.4477
mdominesey@sibley.org
http://www.sibley.org
JULI BOVARD RN CCDS
REGIONAL HEALTH
Tracy M Peyton RN, CCDS
Bradford Regional Medical Center
Upper Allegany Health Systems
116 Interstate Parkway
Bradford, PA 16701
814-558-0406
April Floyd, RN, CCDS
Director of CDCI
Anderson RMC, Meridian, MS
601-553-6299
However, some of the NLP software to issue a query is impressive and will probably perform at least some of the standard queries automatically.
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
out with great hair, and warm, inviting, generous personalities
Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS, CDIP Clinical Documentation
Excellence Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist Sibley
Memorial Hospital
You are my FAVORITE now Mark!
Vanessa Falkoff RN
Clinical Documentation Coordinator
University Medical Center
Las Vegas, NV
vanessa.falkoff@umcsn.com
office 702-383-7322
cell 702-204-0054
I like your comment about cherry picking cases. I seem to remember information regarding this same issue as a compliance risk for RAC auditors and OIG. Do you have any informantion on that I can cite at our facility. My research has turned up nill.
Thanks
Sara Baine, MSN-Ed, CCDS
Clinical Documentation Specialist
Chairman CDMP Taskforce
SoutheastHEALTH
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
San Francisco, CA 94107
Cell: 415.637.9002
Fax: 415.600.1325
Ofc: 415.600.3739
evanspx@sutterhealth.org