Unrelated DRG help

Good morning,

I wanted to find out if anyone else is seeing MORE unrelated procedure DRGs (981-989) post ICD 10 than prior? I ran a report and compared to last year this same time there are at least 10 more cases that coded out to unrelated compared to last year for a 2 month period. I questioned the coders, the coders are stumped too as to why the encoder is coding it that way. Is anyone else running into this trouble? I thought ICD 10 was supposed to reduce these rather than create more. And some of these procedures do relate to the PDx. So I am confused. See the example below:

Pt has cirrhosis of the liver with bleeding esophageal varices. The coder picked the procedure code 06L34CZ which is what is recommended as per guidelines found in Faye Brown. It ended up coding out to DRG 981. Coder can't explain why and has tried multiple times to get the encoder to pick a different DRG, but it always ends up in this DRG.

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

Rebekah Foster PHN, BSN, CCDS
CDI Supervisor
Kaweah Delta Medical Center
400 W. Mineral King
Visalia, CA 93221
559-624-5085

Comments

  • edited March 2016
    Hi-
    I am seeing this as well.
    Take a look at the cases and make sure that the correct approach and location are being applied as this can make the difference between medical vs. surgical drg.
    Thanks,
    Kerry

    Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
    Clinical Documentation Program Manager
    Northern Westchester Hospital
    400 East Main Street
    Mount Kisco, NY 10549
    Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
    Phone: 914-666-1243
    Fax: 914-666-1013



  • edited March 2016
    On that note-removal of a right IJ HD catheter-external or perc approach?
    I've spent way too much time on this case and need some help: )
    Thanks,
    Kerry

    Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
    Clinical Documentation Program Manager
    Northern Westchester Hospital
    400 East Main Street
    Mount Kisco, NY 10549
    Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
    Phone: 914-666-1243
    Fax: 914-666-1013





  • I have coded the scenario stated and generated the Same DRG. (Unrelated).





    The new Fiscal Year has been generating a few odd-ball DRGs, such as this, in my opinion.







    Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS



    Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity

    Sutter West Bay

    633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044

    San Francisco, CA 94107

    Cell: 415.412.9421



    evanspx@sutterhealth.org







    -----Original Message-----
    From: CDI Talk [mailto:cdi_talk@hcprotalk.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 8:44 AM
    To: Evans, Paul
    Subject: RE: [cdi_talk] Unrelated DRG help



    Hi-

    I am seeing this as well.

    Take a look at the cases and make sure that the correct approach and location are being applied as this can make the difference between medical vs. surgical drg.

    Thanks,

    Kerry



    Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP

    Clinical Documentation Program Manager

    Northern Westchester Hospital

    400 East Main Street

    Mount Kisco, NY 10549

    Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net

    Phone: 914-666-1243

    Fax: 914-666-1013











    -----Original Message-----

    From: CDI Talk [mailto:cdi_talk@hcprotalk.com]

    Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:26 PM

    To: Seekircher, Kerry

    Subject: [cdi_talk] Unrelated DRG help



    Good morning,



    I wanted to find out if anyone else is seeing MORE unrelated procedure DRGs (981-989) post ICD 10 than prior? I ran a report and compared to last year this same time there are at least 10 more cases that coded out to unrelated compared to last year for a 2 month period. I questioned the coders, the coders are stumped too as to why the encoder is coding it that way. Is anyone else running into this trouble? I thought ICD 10 was supposed to reduce these rather than create more. And some of these procedures do relate to the PDx. So I am confused. See the example below:



    Pt has cirrhosis of the liver with bleeding esophageal varices. The coder picked the procedure code 06L34CZ which is what is recommended as per guidelines found in Faye Brown. It ended up coding out to DRG 981. Coder can't explain why and has tried multiple times to get the encoder to pick a different DRG, but it always ends up in this DRG.



    Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!



    Rebekah Foster PHN, BSN, CCDS

    CDI Supervisor

    Kaweah Delta Medical Center

    400 W. Mineral King

    Visalia, CA 93221

    559-624-5085

    ---

    CDI Talk is offered for networking purposes. For official rules and regulations related to documentation and coding, please refer to your regulatory source.



    You are receiving this message as a member of CDI Talk as: kseekircher@nwhc.net If you would like to be removed from CDI Talk, please send a blank email to leave-cdi_talk-20097959.d65e69fc5d7027e8a40023ced48ccf9e@hcprotalk.com

    ---

    Copyright 2013

    HCPro, Inc., 75 Sylvan Street, Danvers MA 01923



    Note:

    This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. This organization and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.



    Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity.



    ---

    CDI Talk is offered for networking purposes. For official rules and regulations related to documentation and coding, please refer to your regulatory source.



    You are receiving this message as a member of CDI Talk as: evanspx@sutterhealth.org If you would like to be removed from CDI Talk, please send a blank email to leave-cdi_talk-12940161.4b24e9352adc7dfa247d8332246d4e2a@hcprotalk.com

    ---

    Copyright 2013

    HCPro, Inc., 75 Sylvan Street, Danvers MA 01923
  • edited March 2016
    Glad to hear its not just our facility that is seeing that. We are even seeing Art lines ending up in the OR category. No matter what way we run that code it comes out as an OR procedure with certain Dx. Very odd. Wonder when that will change? Thanks for the feedback, even if its just to know you all are seeing it too.

    Rebekah Foster, PHN, BSN, CCDS
    CDI Supervisor
  • "Everyone' (coders, CDI) are anecdotally noting that procedures, such as A-lines, are now impacting the DRG structure in ways not anticipated. As I am no longer a coding manager, I confess I have not fully investigated the root cause(s). However, I am coding A-lines (and banding of esophageal Varices) and now noting apparent issues with DRG assignment that seem to have occurred w/ cases for this Fiscal Year.

    I do not know if these changes were anticipated by CMS and are part of the current DRG grouper logic?

    I believe more information must be forthcoming on such issues?



    Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
     
    Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
    Sutter West Bay
    633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
    San Francisco, CA 94107
    Cell:  415.412.9421

    evanspx@sutterhealth.org




  • edited March 2016
    Let's hope so. In the meantime, I guess we just continue coding A-lines, banding of varices, and assigning unrelated DRGs... but man, that just chaps my hide that we can't find a better assignment with some of these scenarios! Thanks!

    Rebekah Foster, PHN, BSN, CCDS
    CDI Supervisor
  • edited March 2016
    Thanks Jeff-that is what I am recommending. I hope we are right!

    Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
    Clinical Documentation Program Manager
    Northern Westchester Hospital
    400 East Main Street
    Mount Kisco, NY 10549
    Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
    Phone: 914-666-1243
    Fax: 914-666-1013





  • External is approach.

    Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
     
    Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
    Sutter West Bay
    633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
    San Francisco, CA 94107
    Cell:  415.412.9421

    evanspx@sutterhealth.org




  • edited March 2016
    Having removed some IJ lines, it's not an open or percutaneous procedure. Even if it were tunneled, it's removal of sutures and PUL-L-L-L-L!! (gently!)

    Robert S. Gold, MD
    CEO, DCBA, Inc
    4611 Brierwood Place
    Atlanta, GA 30360
    (770) 216-9691 (Office)
    (404) 580-0204 (Cell)


  • Very, Very, Concerning to me, as well. I anticipate perhaps an "oooppps" moment from CMS and perhaps some revised billing with takebacks? I'd really like to speak to this issue as someone more informed, but I have not had time to dive so deeply into this particular issue.

    Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
     
    Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
    Sutter West Bay
    633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
    San Francisco, CA 94107
    Cell:  415.412.9421

    evanspx@sutterhealth.org




  • edited March 2016
    Thanks Paul!

    Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
    Clinical Documentation Program Manager
    Northern Westchester Hospital
    400 East Main Street
    Mount Kisco, NY 10549
    Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
    Phone: 914-666-1243
    Fax: 914-666-1013





  • edited March 2016
    Thanks Dr. Gold : )

    Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
    Clinical Documentation Program Manager
    Northern Westchester Hospital
    400 East Main Street
    Mount Kisco, NY 10549
    Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
    Phone: 914-666-1243
    Fax: 914-666-1013





  • I've got one!!!

    I have a patient that came in with massive ascites (leaking out of an umbilical hernia) 2/2 ESLD 2/2 ETOH + Hepatitis C. She had a paracentesis.

    The coder has B19.20 (viral hepatitis C) as Pdx and she has the procedure coded as OW9G3ZZ (drainage of peritoneal cavity, perc approach) as Ppx.

    We landed in DRG982 (extensive OT procedure unrelated to principle)


    Is that right?


    Also, I ran a report for these DRG's. We have seen a 4-fold increase since I-10!!!


    Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
    Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
    AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
    Flagstaff Medical Center
    Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
    Cell: 928.814.9404


  • edited March 2016
    The hepatitis was not the focus of the admission nor the procedure. The ascites should be first unless there is direction to precede. Looks like K70.11 for alcoholic cirrhosis with ascites should be principal followed by the specific viral hepatitis. That would take the DRG to where it deserves to be.

    Robert S. Gold, MD
    CEO, DCBA, Inc
    4611 Brierwood Place
    Atlanta, GA 30360
    (770) 216-9691 (Office)
    (404) 580-0204 (Cell)

  • Yes. This was my first thought. But even if I put the alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites (k7031) as Pdx, I still end up in 982?

    Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
    Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
    AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
    Flagstaff Medical Center
    Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
    Cell: 928.814.9404


  • edited March 2016
    With K70.11 and 0W9G3ZZ, I get DRG 434.

    Robert S. Gold, MD
    CEO, DCBA, Inc
    4611 Brierwood Place
    Atlanta, GA 30360
    (770) 216-9691 (Office)
    (404) 580-0204 (Cell)


  • edited March 2016
    I get DRG 434 as well with PDX of K70.11 or K70.31 & 0W9G3ZZ
    The encoder we use is by Clintegrity (Quantim).


    Mayra Luciano, BS, BSN, RN
    Clinical Dcoumentation Improvement Specialist
    Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center
    101 Hospital Road
    Patchogue, NY 11772
    631 438 5268
    mluciano@bmhmc.org



  • There are several DRG shifts due to what I also think are "glitches" in the ICD-10 DRG groupings.

    As Paul noted, arterial catheter insertions (percutaneous approach) is one. Another one is PDx (any hepatobiliary PDx) with TIPS procedure. Apparently a TIPS procedure is only indexed to MDC 5 (Circulatory) so you end up with an unrelated surgical DRG.

    I work as a remote CDS and my facility has chosen NOT to code arterial catheters unless inserted in the OR (which is then almost always a teriary procedure, not affecting the DRG). They only code the 'monitoring' PCS code.
  • edited March 2016
    Question from a coder to the clinical experts: Does 'ascites 2/2 ESLD 2/2 ETOH + hepatitis C" = cirrhosis? Would a query be necessary to get to cirrhosis? I understand that it most likely is but can we make that jump without asking the provider?

  • Ahhhh!!! I figured out the issue! There is an additional procedure code driving the DRG

    We have two procedure codes coded.

    Ppx: 0W9G3ZZ (paracentesis)
    Spx: 0WHG33Z(placement of peritoneal catheter). I am not sure this one is right? We placed a tunneled peritoneal catheter under u/s guidance. She has the 6th character device code as an infusion device??

    Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
    Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
    AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
    Flagstaff Medical Center
    Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
    Cell: 928.814.9404


  • Ok. I think this is the issue.

    As I said, the coder had two procedures coded:
    Ppx: 0W9G3ZZ (paracentesis)
    Spx: 0WHG33Z(placement of peritoneal catheter).- driving us into the 'unrelated' DRG

    I think the second one is incorrect. I think 0WHG33Z would be used for a peritoneal dialysis catheter as this is an infusion device. I 'think' that for a tunneled peritoneal cathester for long-term drainage of ascites would be 0W9G30Z (drainage of peritoneal cavity with drainage device, perc)

    Does that sounds right?

    This puts us in DRG 442


    Thanks so much for all the discussion!


    Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
    Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
    AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
    Flagstaff Medical Center
    Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
    Cell: 928.814.9404


Sign In or Register to comment.