Unrelated DRG help
Good morning,
I wanted to find out if anyone else is seeing MORE unrelated procedure DRGs (981-989) post ICD 10 than prior? I ran a report and compared to last year this same time there are at least 10 more cases that coded out to unrelated compared to last year for a 2 month period. I questioned the coders, the coders are stumped too as to why the encoder is coding it that way. Is anyone else running into this trouble? I thought ICD 10 was supposed to reduce these rather than create more. And some of these procedures do relate to the PDx. So I am confused. See the example below:
Pt has cirrhosis of the liver with bleeding esophageal varices. The coder picked the procedure code 06L34CZ which is what is recommended as per guidelines found in Faye Brown. It ended up coding out to DRG 981. Coder can't explain why and has tried multiple times to get the encoder to pick a different DRG, but it always ends up in this DRG.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Rebekah Foster PHN, BSN, CCDS
CDI Supervisor
Kaweah Delta Medical Center
400 W. Mineral King
Visalia, CA 93221
559-624-5085
I wanted to find out if anyone else is seeing MORE unrelated procedure DRGs (981-989) post ICD 10 than prior? I ran a report and compared to last year this same time there are at least 10 more cases that coded out to unrelated compared to last year for a 2 month period. I questioned the coders, the coders are stumped too as to why the encoder is coding it that way. Is anyone else running into this trouble? I thought ICD 10 was supposed to reduce these rather than create more. And some of these procedures do relate to the PDx. So I am confused. See the example below:
Pt has cirrhosis of the liver with bleeding esophageal varices. The coder picked the procedure code 06L34CZ which is what is recommended as per guidelines found in Faye Brown. It ended up coding out to DRG 981. Coder can't explain why and has tried multiple times to get the encoder to pick a different DRG, but it always ends up in this DRG.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Rebekah Foster PHN, BSN, CCDS
CDI Supervisor
Kaweah Delta Medical Center
400 W. Mineral King
Visalia, CA 93221
559-624-5085
Comments
I am seeing this as well.
Take a look at the cases and make sure that the correct approach and location are being applied as this can make the difference between medical vs. surgical drg.
Thanks,
Kerry
Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Program Manager
Northern Westchester Hospital
400 East Main Street
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
Phone: 914-666-1243
Fax: 914-666-1013
I've spent way too much time on this case and need some help: )
Thanks,
Kerry
Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Program Manager
Northern Westchester Hospital
400 East Main Street
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
Phone: 914-666-1243
Fax: 914-666-1013
The new Fiscal Year has been generating a few odd-ball DRGs, such as this, in my opinion.
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
Sutter West Bay
633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
San Francisco, CA 94107
Cell: 415.412.9421
evanspx@sutterhealth.org
-----Original Message-----
From: CDI Talk [mailto:cdi_talk@hcprotalk.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 8:44 AM
To: Evans, Paul
Subject: RE: [cdi_talk] Unrelated DRG help
Hi-
I am seeing this as well.
Take a look at the cases and make sure that the correct approach and location are being applied as this can make the difference between medical vs. surgical drg.
Thanks,
Kerry
Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Program Manager
Northern Westchester Hospital
400 East Main Street
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
Phone: 914-666-1243
Fax: 914-666-1013
-----Original Message-----
From: CDI Talk [mailto:cdi_talk@hcprotalk.com]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:26 PM
To: Seekircher, Kerry
Subject: [cdi_talk] Unrelated DRG help
Good morning,
I wanted to find out if anyone else is seeing MORE unrelated procedure DRGs (981-989) post ICD 10 than prior? I ran a report and compared to last year this same time there are at least 10 more cases that coded out to unrelated compared to last year for a 2 month period. I questioned the coders, the coders are stumped too as to why the encoder is coding it that way. Is anyone else running into this trouble? I thought ICD 10 was supposed to reduce these rather than create more. And some of these procedures do relate to the PDx. So I am confused. See the example below:
Pt has cirrhosis of the liver with bleeding esophageal varices. The coder picked the procedure code 06L34CZ which is what is recommended as per guidelines found in Faye Brown. It ended up coding out to DRG 981. Coder can't explain why and has tried multiple times to get the encoder to pick a different DRG, but it always ends up in this DRG.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Rebekah Foster PHN, BSN, CCDS
CDI Supervisor
Kaweah Delta Medical Center
400 W. Mineral King
Visalia, CA 93221
559-624-5085
---
CDI Talk is offered for networking purposes. For official rules and regulations related to documentation and coding, please refer to your regulatory source.
You are receiving this message as a member of CDI Talk as: kseekircher@nwhc.net If you would like to be removed from CDI Talk, please send a blank email to leave-cdi_talk-20097959.d65e69fc5d7027e8a40023ced48ccf9e@hcprotalk.com
---
Copyright 2013
HCPro, Inc., 75 Sylvan Street, Danvers MA 01923
Note:
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. This organization and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity.
---
CDI Talk is offered for networking purposes. For official rules and regulations related to documentation and coding, please refer to your regulatory source.
You are receiving this message as a member of CDI Talk as: evanspx@sutterhealth.org If you would like to be removed from CDI Talk, please send a blank email to leave-cdi_talk-12940161.4b24e9352adc7dfa247d8332246d4e2a@hcprotalk.com
---
Copyright 2013
HCPro, Inc., 75 Sylvan Street, Danvers MA 01923
Rebekah Foster, PHN, BSN, CCDS
CDI Supervisor
I do not know if these changes were anticipated by CMS and are part of the current DRG grouper logic?
I believe more information must be forthcoming on such issues?
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
Sutter West Bay
633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
San Francisco, CA 94107
Cell: 415.412.9421
evanspx@sutterhealth.org
Rebekah Foster, PHN, BSN, CCDS
CDI Supervisor
Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Program Manager
Northern Westchester Hospital
400 East Main Street
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
Phone: 914-666-1243
Fax: 914-666-1013
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
Sutter West Bay
633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
San Francisco, CA 94107
Cell: 415.412.9421
evanspx@sutterhealth.org
Robert S. Gold, MD
CEO, DCBA, Inc
4611 Brierwood Place
Atlanta, GA 30360
(770) 216-9691 (Office)
(404) 580-0204 (Cell)
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS
Manager, Regional Clinical Documentation & Coding Integrity
Sutter West Bay
633 Folsom St., 7th Floor, Office 7-044
San Francisco, CA 94107
Cell: 415.412.9421
evanspx@sutterhealth.org
Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Program Manager
Northern Westchester Hospital
400 East Main Street
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
Phone: 914-666-1243
Fax: 914-666-1013
Kerry Seekircher, RN, BS, CCDS, CDIP
Clinical Documentation Program Manager
Northern Westchester Hospital
400 East Main Street
Mount Kisco, NY 10549
Email: kseekircher@nwhc.net
Phone: 914-666-1243
Fax: 914-666-1013
I have a patient that came in with massive ascites (leaking out of an umbilical hernia) 2/2 ESLD 2/2 ETOH + Hepatitis C. She had a paracentesis.
The coder has B19.20 (viral hepatitis C) as Pdx and she has the procedure coded as OW9G3ZZ (drainage of peritoneal cavity, perc approach) as Ppx.
We landed in DRG982 (extensive OT procedure unrelated to principle)
Is that right?
Also, I ran a report for these DRG's. We have seen a 4-fold increase since I-10!!!
Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
Flagstaff Medical Center
Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
Cell: 928.814.9404
Robert S. Gold, MD
CEO, DCBA, Inc
4611 Brierwood Place
Atlanta, GA 30360
(770) 216-9691 (Office)
(404) 580-0204 (Cell)
Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
Flagstaff Medical Center
Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
Cell: 928.814.9404
Robert S. Gold, MD
CEO, DCBA, Inc
4611 Brierwood Place
Atlanta, GA 30360
(770) 216-9691 (Office)
(404) 580-0204 (Cell)
The encoder we use is by Clintegrity (Quantim).
Mayra Luciano, BS, BSN, RN
Clinical Dcoumentation Improvement Specialist
Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center
101 Hospital Road
Patchogue, NY 11772
631 438 5268
mluciano@bmhmc.org
As Paul noted, arterial catheter insertions (percutaneous approach) is one. Another one is PDx (any hepatobiliary PDx) with TIPS procedure. Apparently a TIPS procedure is only indexed to MDC 5 (Circulatory) so you end up with an unrelated surgical DRG.
I work as a remote CDS and my facility has chosen NOT to code arterial catheters unless inserted in the OR (which is then almost always a teriary procedure, not affecting the DRG). They only code the 'monitoring' PCS code.
We have two procedure codes coded.
Ppx: 0W9G3ZZ (paracentesis)
Spx: 0WHG33Z(placement of peritoneal catheter). I am not sure this one is right? We placed a tunneled peritoneal catheter under u/s guidance. She has the 6th character device code as an infusion device??
Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
Flagstaff Medical Center
Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
Cell: 928.814.9404
As I said, the coder had two procedures coded:
Ppx: 0W9G3ZZ (paracentesis)
Spx: 0WHG33Z(placement of peritoneal catheter).- driving us into the 'unrelated' DRG
I think the second one is incorrect. I think 0WHG33Z would be used for a peritoneal dialysis catheter as this is an infusion device. I 'think' that for a tunneled peritoneal cathester for long-term drainage of ascites would be 0W9G30Z (drainage of peritoneal cavity with drainage device, perc)
Does that sounds right?
This puts us in DRG 442
Thanks so much for all the discussion!
Katy Good, RN, BSN, CCDS, CCS
Clinical Documentation Program Coordinator
AHIMA Approved ICD-10CM/PCS Trainer
Flagstaff Medical Center
Kathryn.Good@nahealth.com
Cell: 928.814.9404