Quality Metric Capture
How are you managing to capture or your CDI quality efforts? For example ensuring a PSI post-op complication that is NOT a true complication doesn't get coded as such? Are you just doing a tally of the number of cases that you "save"? Thanks for your time.
Tagged:
Comments
We do have a retro PSI process though where all coded PSI-90 records are reviewed to make sure that coding was accurate. When we do pull these back and re-code, I do track this impact as i am confident that we truly had final impact on these records.
Katy Good
Katy-
I appreciate your comments. We are in quality too, and that is where the questions for capturing quality metrics were coming from- Besides the obvious revenue adjustments and CMI, I have been asked to find a tracking mechanism (beyond SOI/ROM) for quality metrics thus providing further proof and justification that CDI is impacting more than the bottom line. There in lies the struggle.
You certainly could track these kinds of queries, I just dont like the idea of assuming that anything you queried on would otherwise have resulted in a PSI/complication. Also keep in mine that (as always) tracking queries does not account for impact made via CDI education.
Katy
Yes and I agree- we aren't assuming anything, just documenting the "catch", especially of an obvious error in the physician's choice of wording- looking beyond the simple tally/spreadsheet.