Tracking Revenue losses

Hi Everyone,

I realize this may be a silly question but I was asked to see if anyone in the CDI community, software or manually, tracks revenue losses. I just need some feedback.

I personally feel that SOI/ROM should be our focus but we are manual and have no way to show that information other than revenue increases. Carla Heyn, RHIT, BS CDS

Comments

  • edited May 2016
    I have tried to do this -- but my data structure and analysis is also manual, so it adds another block of time required.

    Found it helpful when attempting to focus on the impact of a relative lack of participation by individual or specialty group. Especially useful in that light if the data also showed a 'lag' for that group in mortality or LOS index against peer groups on a national level. (We are members in UHC, so use that data source for the index data as well as cc/mcc capture).

    Do need to be very careful on how this type of data is handled and shared. Can back fire.

    Am wondering if there is anyone out there who could share about the reporting abilities of some of the bigger software or consultant vendors (thinking of 3M with CDIS software, as well as others).

    Don


  • edited May 2016
    The JA Thomas software will track negative and no response impacts for us.

    Tracy M Peyton RN, CCDS
    Case Management
    Bradford Regional Medical Center
    Upper Allegany Health Systems
    116 Interstate Parkway
    Bradford, PA 16701
    814-558-0406






  • edited May 2016
    This is a multipart message in MIME format.
    --=_alternative 00406308852578A8_=
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

    Many institutions don't have the extra money to invest in a company to do
    the tracking for you but you can easily do this on the same spreadsheet
    you are using to track the impact. If a query or an interaction does not
    result in a simple clarification or capturing a more definitive diagnosis
    than you formulate your excel sheet so that the case weight comparison is
    the potential compared to actual instead of actual with the impact (and
    the impact means it is the ONLY reason that the DRG changed). I have been
    tracking case weight changes like this for years and the data keeps me in
    tune to which physician or physician group I need to revisit, which query
    might need an update, which CMS change is affecting our CMI and where we
    are about getting it right and complete.
    If you don't love statistics like I do ... ask for help on how to set it
    up from somebody in your facility.

    Gail Marini MM, RN, CCS
    Manager Clinical Documentation (CDI)
    Finance Department
    781-624-8413 (4:30am - 1pm)
    B- 7757





  • Hi Don,

    I'm glad to hear from you.

    Well, we have a mortality review committee and sometimes we do not agree on the DRG. Once reviewed we sometimes go with the lower DRG because it is the right thing to do. So it is a loss eventhough we may gain an increase in SOI/ROM. Of course, we do not know exactly if it does since we do not have any software. We gained a increase in money but there is a question to minus the losses in this number for presentation to administration. I do not feel comfortable with reporting this because I can not off set it with actual data of SOI increase so I do not wish to report it. This would be the same for tracking monthly $ increases as well. What do you think on this?
  • edited May 2016
    My general take on the situation where action by CDI (or Mortality review committee, etc.) results in a lower financial return....don't count it as a negative financial impact -- one's actions in these cases are to 'get it right', and thus the 'negative' financial impact is NOT a true impact in the first place: the higher weighted DRG is one that the organization SHOULDN'T have received in the first place.

    A common example is the downward shift from sepsis to complication of a urinary catheter with the patient with chronic foley. Query for the relationship because it is the RIGHT thing to do, even if it may in the short term appear to mean lower revenue.

    Not sure if you are also asking about some sort of financial gain secondary to the increased SOI/ROM -- not sure how that happens if the final DRG is lower weighted?

    Don


  • edited May 2016
    Tracy -- which version of the software are you using? The access based or SQL? or do they have a third version?

    We are using the older access based software, and are considering options going forward for software upgrade.

    Thanks,
    Don


  • edited May 2016
    This is a multipart message in MIME format.

    --=_alternative 0048FCD2852578A8_=
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="US-ASCII"

    We track negative impact, more to show compliance and the focus of the
    program. We have worked really hard to make it know that we are focused on
    quality than financial.
    Thank You,
    Susan Tiffany RN, CCDS
    Supervisor Clinical Documentation Program
    Guthrie Healthcare System
    "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you
    didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail
    away from safe harbor.Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream.
    Discover." Mark Twain







  • I am really glad to see that people are tracking their negatives, and more importantly, are willing to go out there and "take money away" in the pursuit of an accurate chart. Yes, JATA software does measure negative dollars, but it will subtract from positives, which incentivizes the CDS not to ask, and makes a mockery of the first word in their software title, Compliant. We have the old software, so maybe SQL doesn't do that? Tracy, when you say it measures negatives, do you mean the physician said no, or do you mean that your query improved the chart but brought the RW down?

    It would be really interesting to do a study of cases where the RW was lowered to see if the SOI/ROM was affected upward or downward as well. But with the program we have, I am pretty sure not many negative dollar impact queries are asked. There's too much of a culture to bring in money.

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • edited May 2016
    This is a multipart message in MIME format.
    --=_alternative 004E636F862578A8_=
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

    we also track negative impact. The goal is quality and accuracy.

    Stacy Vaughn, RHIT, CCS, CCDS
    Data Support Specialist/DRG Assurance
    Aurora Baycare Medical Center
    2845 Greenbrier Rd
    Green Bay, WI 54311
    Phone: (920) 288-8655
    Fax: (920) 288-3052




  • As usual, I'm with you Renee. The goal has to be a complete and accurate medical record. While I track potential impact, I don't include the dollars in my reports from our new software package primarily because they are not accurate, but also because that's not where the focus needs to be. Of course it does make it easier when you can show some potential impact, but I always qualify it with a "best guess" statement since I don't do billing and never know for sure what that impact is.

    Robert

    Robert S. Hodges, BSN, MSN, RN, CCDS
    Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
    Aleda E. Lutz VAMC
    Mail Code 136
    1500 Weiss Street
    Saginaw MI 48602
     
    P: 989-497-2500 x13101
    F: 989-321-4912
    E: Robert.Hodges2@va.gov
     
    "The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug." Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

    "This email is intended only for the use of the person or office to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by law. All others are hereby notified that the receipt of this email does not waive any applicable privilege or exemption for disclosure and that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify this office immediately at the telephone number listed above."

    -----Original Message-----
    From: CDI Talk [mailto:cdi_talk@hcprotalk.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 9:56 AM
    To: Hodges, Robert
    Subject: Re:[cdi_talk] Tracking Revenue losses

    I am really glad to see that people are tracking their negatives, and more importantly, are willing to go out there and "take money away" in the pursuit of an accurate chart. Yes, JATA software does measure negative dollars, but it will subtract from positives, which incentivizes the CDS not to ask, and makes a mockery of the first word in their software title, Compliant. We have the old software, so maybe SQL doesn't do that? Tracy, when you say it measures negatives, do you mean the physician said no, or do you mean that your query improved the chart but brought the RW down?

    It would be really interesting to do a study of cases where the RW was lowered to see if the SOI/ROM was affected upward or downward as well. But with the program we have, I am pretty sure not many negative dollar impact queries are asked. There's too much of a culture to bring in money.

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center



    ---
    CDI Talk is offered for networking purposes. For official rules and regulations related to documentation and coding, please refer to your regulatory source.

    You are receiving this message as a member of CDI Talk as: robert.hodges2@va.gov
    If you would like to be removed from CDI Talk, please send a blank email to
    leave-cdi_talk-10741982.fced5831ab44431e3f844a057071eb02@hcprotalk.com
    ---
    Copyright 2010
    HCPro, Inc., 200 Hoods Lane, Marblehead, MA 01945
  • edited May 2016
    Renee I mean the cases which we clarify for a lower wt drg

    Tracy M Peyton RN, CCDS
    Case Management
    Bradford Regional Medical Center
    Upper Allegany Health Systems
    116 Interstate Parkway
    Bradford, PA 16701
    814-558-0406






  • edited May 2016
    Don
    We are currently using sql....

    Tracy M Peyton RN, CCDS
    Case Management
    Bradford Regional Medical Center
    Upper Allegany Health Systems
    116 Interstate Parkway
    Bradford, PA 16701
    814-558-0406





    ________________________________________

  • We use navigant software and it does track the negatives. We were trained to
    have the chart be coded accurately and reflect accurately, so the negative
    variances are what they are. I personally have them every month.





    ________________________________
    From: CDI Talk
    To: sears.kelley@yahoo.com
    Sent: Tue, June 7, 2011 11:11:04 AM
    Subject: RE: Re:[cdi_talk] Tracking Revenue losses

    Renee I mean the cases which we clarify for a lower wt drg

    Tracy M Peyton RN, CCDS
    Case Management
    Bradford Regional Medical Center
    Upper Allegany Health Systems
    116 Interstate Parkway
    Bradford, PA 16701
    814-558-0406





    ________________________________________
    From: CDI Talk [cdi_talk@hcprotalk.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 9:55 AM
    To: Peyton, Tracy
    Subject: Re:[cdi_talk] Tracking Revenue losses

    I am really glad to see that people are tracking their negatives, and more
    importantly, are willing to go out there and "take money away" in the pursuit of
    an accurate chart. Yes, JATA software does measure negative dollars, but it will
    subtract from positives, which incentivizes the CDS not to ask, and makes a
    mockery of the first word in their software title, Compliant.
  • edited May 2016
    Nice discussion here, just wanted to throw out for discussion does anybody track the amount of monies taken back by the RAC, CERT or MAC based upon their interpretation of the diagnoses in the record or perhaps a CC or MCC obtained through the query process that maybe is only documented once in the record or is intepreted to be of little clinical significance.

  • edited May 2016
    Our RAC coordinator tracks all monies taken back. As well, whenever we get a RAC denial for DRG downgrade, the coding director, the CDI's, RAC coordinator and a coder review the case and meet as a group to discuss whether we agree or need to appeal. So far, I have had 2 DRG downgrades appealed and overturned at the first level.

    Also, our system does track "QA" cases and the money involved. These are cases where we have queried for a lower wt DRG and the physician agreed and the amount of money impacted. We actually have quite a few every month although the higher wt queries very much outweigh them.


  • We have not been involved in the appeal process; probably because in this region at least, the RAC is still just having a field day with medical necessity and not so much with DRGs, but I have asked that we be included in the feedback loop so that we can educate physicians on what kind of documentation might help avoid the denials in the first place. No response, though.

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • Renee, What region are you in for RACS We are in A and we have very little DRG reviews.

    Carla Heyn, RHIT, BS
    Elliot Hospital, Manchester, NH
  • We are in region D, Arizona.

    Renee
  • Renee,

    Since you are using JAThomas, what exactly do your losses include and how is it calculated?
    Is it after the bill goes out or prior to the bill?

    Carla H.
  • Carla, with the old JATA software that we use, if I ask a query that lowers the RW, such as asking if sepsis due to cellulitis was POA, changing it from an MCC to the PDX, the software shows a negative dollar impact. Unfortunately, the culture here is that you don't ask a question if it doesn't increase revenue, so nobody's tracking it, AFAIK.

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • edited May 2016
    Similarily for us, we will and encourage those type of questions -- but will mark it as a severity and don't put into the software an initial, potential and final DRG. The final worksheet will have the query, response, and only one DRG (that resulted from the query). This way we do not have a negative financial impact on our finance metrics, but are still getting 'credit' for the query activity and are documenting the query from a compliance perspective.

    Don


Sign In or Register to comment.