traumatic intracranial bleed and brain compression/herniation

I know I was told by one of our coders at one point that the MCC "brain compression" was inherent in the traumatic bleed codes. However, now I can't find that reference anywhere.
Anyone know where it is?

Also, I'm assuming brain herniation is inherent to because ti codes to 348.4. brain compression as well?


Thanks,
Katy

Comments

  • oops! I just saw this was referenced in the most recent Acdis Journal. So it is a part of the traumatic intracranial bleed but it also states that the specific injury can still be coded. I'm not exactly sure what that means?
  • It (compression) is not 'inherent' to ICH, stroke, or neoplasms
    occupying space and causing 'midline shift" with neurological
    consequences, such as hernia and or diffuse edema of the brain.

    Separate codes exist precisely to report the clinically significant
    edema and/or hernia of the brain when these are stated as a consequence
    of an underlying process. One codes the stroke or neoplasm as the
    principal condition with the edema or hernia as a secondary. So, when
    these are stated, they should be coded to fully describe the complexity
    of the case.

    Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P
    Supervisor, Clinical Documentation Integrity, Quality Department
    California Pacific Medical Center
    2351 Clay #243
    San Francisco, CA 94115
    Cell: 415.637.9002
    Fax: 415.600.1325
    Ofc: 415.600.3739
  • edited May 2016
    If you go to Compression in the alpha code book, you will find the following:
    Compression
    brain 348.4
    due to
    contusion, brain - see Contusion, brain
    injury NEC - see also Hemorrhage, brain, traumatic
    laceration, brain - see Laceration, brain

    This indicates the code for the injury includes compression of brain when due to injury.

    Per the alpha code book, brain herniation and brain edema CAN be coded in addition to the injury code.

    However based on the Coding Clinic below, brain compression can be coded in addition to injury code.
    Shift and mass effect and brain compression
    Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2011 Page: 11 Effective with discharges: September 23, 2011

    Question:
    The patient suffered an acute subdural hematoma with shift and mass effect. We have been instructed by a consultant that shift and mass effect are clinically synonymous with brain compression and should be coded as such. Would it be appropriate to assign code 348.4, Compression of brain, based on the provider’s documentation of "mass effect or midline shift"?

    Answer:

    The coder should not make the assumption that midline shift or mass effect is synonymous with brain compression. The coder should query the provider and if the provider clarifies and documents that the "mass effect" or "midline shift" is brain compression, the coder may then assign a code for the brain compression.

    Bottom Line for me - Always go with the code books when there is a descrepancy. I am going to ask CC about this though.

    Sharon
  • Paul,

    Thats what I assumed intially. But, our coders have told me that when the injury is traumatic, they are not supposed to code the compression separately (they do code the edema). They only feel this way aobut the traumatic injury. Not a CVA or tumor.

    In the Acdis journal, it states;
    "Traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, ICD-9-CM code set 853.xx (other and unspecified intracranial hemorrhage following injury), does include the sub-term "cerebral compression due to injury". Coders should also report a code for the specific injury when possible."
    However that only is talking about the 853 codes, not 852.

    I guess i'm not exactly sure what the Acdis article is suggesting. When I read it the first time, I read it as confirming what I had been told by our coders. But, is also is saying to code a specific injury, so I'm not sure.

    I'm confused. We have a couple coders that had already told me this "rule". We recently got a contract coder, and she says the same.

    I really appreciate your input,

    Katy
  • Sharon,

    The coding clinic is not referencing traumatic ICH, so as you state, when you drill into brain compression, it codes back out to the ICH and therefore can't be used as a secondary dx. Only with nontraumatic ICH can brain compression be coded separately. That's why I'm always looking at the etiology of any intracranial bleed and querying when it's unclear.

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • Linda,
    This is what I am being told (you are much more eloquent in your explanation!). Do you have a reference to this?

    Thanks,
    Katy
  • Katy,

    Do you have access to an encoder? Do a drilldown for brain compression--if you take it to a traumatic etiology, it will loop you back to the brain hemorrhage, without a separate code for the brain compression.

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • I would code the edema or hernia if/when due to intrinsic process, such
    as tumor or ICH.

    Initially, I did not know you were referring to these processes with
    TRAUMA. I would not report anything from the 3XX series if these are
    due to trauma as the codes from the 3XX are not use to report trauma.

    I don't understand why your coders would chose to code the edema, but
    not the hernia in conjunction with the trauma codes.

    The codes in 850 - 854 provide specificity regarding the type of
    intracranial injury due to trauma. Example: 851.5X is used to report:
    Brain stem contusion due to trauma WITH open intracranial wound. You
    can review further examples in the Tabular.

    Due to this coding convention, I would use 'only' the trauma codes for
    traumatic injuries of the brain.

    I do code edema and hernia as secondary when these occur with ICH or
    stroke.


    You further explanations provided clarity to the question.

    Paul

    Paul Evans, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P
    Supervisor, Clinical Documentation Integrity, Quality Department
    California Pacific Medical Center
    2351 Clay #243
    San Francisco, CA 94115
    Cell: 415.637.9002
    Fax: 415.600.1325
    Ofc: 415.600.3739
  • Renee,

    I do. That was one of the ways the coders told me its not possible to code it. I was just hoping tehre was something written down. But, i trust your judgement! More than anything, just wanted to make sure I'm on the right page here.

    So, In your opinion then, if the patient has herniation of the brain, can that be coded? As far as I can tell, the encoder does let me do that. I'm just wondering since it codes out to the "brain compression" code.
  • edited May 2016
    Linda -Silly question perhaps, but how can you tell CC is not referencing a traumatic ICH? I agree the answer would make it seem so based on the alpha and tabular.

    Sharon
  • Sharon,

    I am just reading the CC to its last word, and if it doesn't say it, it seems to me then it doesn't include it, particularly given the way brain compression d/t traumatic ICH codes out. ICBW, but we both agree on how it codes out in the alpha & tabular list, and that's why I'm being so literal. I have a sneaking suspicion that when they wrote the response, they weren't even thinking about traumatic ICH.

    But I think your plan to ask CC is excellent. Won't it be cool to have a CC in response to your very own question? :)

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • edited May 2016
    I feel the same way re if it doesn't say it, it doesn't include it and I am sure you are correct in your reasoning based on the answer. However I just think it interesting that I, as a coder first, and you, as a RN first, look at it differently. I went through the logic tree using only the information in the question and came up with 852.21. I started off with:

    Hematoma, 6-unspecified, 5-Other, 1-Brain, 6-Subdural, 2-no fx, 3-Other/Unspec, 2-W/O open wound, 1-no unconsciousness, 1-No complication, (ignore E-codes) and come up with 852.21

    It comes out the same if you use the book - if you start with hematoma, you have to choose non-traumatic to get to 432.1

    The only way I could get to the 432.1 is to start with hemorrhage (instead of hematoma) or choose non-traumatic but the question did not say hemorrhage or non-traumatic. Hemorrhage and hematoma may be used interchangeably but since it did not say it, I did not use it. I know I am probably being way too literal.....

    As I said, I am sure you are correct regarding CC's answer. I agree if the etiology of a bleed is not clear, querying is necessary.

    You are correct - it is cool to see a response to a question you posed. I always figure there must be a lot of other people out there asking the same question!


    Sharon Salinas, CCS
  • edited May 2016
    This was a topic discussed at the last ACDIS conference. A Clinical Review of the MCC/CC List is the presentation. Go to Tools area on ACDIS website to find this presentation. It the slide it does state that you do not code brain compression secondary to trauma.
  • It is as Renee stated: Is the process a stroke, neoplasm or AVM with possible or stated edema or hernia? If so, we can code the edema or hernia as secondary.

    If this is a traumatic injury, code to the trauma section.

    The Coding Clinic states in a nutshell that if edema or hernia ARE documented with an intrinsic disease, we may code the edema or hernia. The particular Coding Clinic does not provide any info re: traumatic brain injury.

    A coder ALWAYS first determines if the process is traumatic versus a stroke or AVM and then proceeds forward.
  • Here is the Coding Clinic - it is not addressing traumatic brain conditons.

    AHA Coding Clinicâ for ICD-9-CM, 3Q 2009, Volume 26, Number 3, Page 8



    Question:

    A patient was admitted through the emergency department (ED) complaining of difficulty exhaling. He also reported experiencing strange smells during the past month. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain done in the ED showed a large mass in the right temporal lobe with a mass effect, pressing the right cerebral peduncle and compression of the cavernous sinus on the right side. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the same findings without surrounding edema. The consulting provider documents most likely slow-growing glioma. The provider's final diagnostic statement indicates newly diagnosed malignant brain tumor. Is it appropriate to assign a code for compression of the cavernous sinus as a secondary diagnosis?



    Answer:

    Assign code 191.2, Malignant neoplasm of brain, Temporal lobe, only, for slow-growing glioma, since it is the more definitive diagnosis. The cavernous sinus compression was a CT scan and MRI finding. The provider's documentation did not indicate that the brain compression was clinically significant; therefore a code for the compression would not be assigned
  • edited May 2016
    The Coding Clinic she referenced and pasted in the email was the following one from Third Quarter 2011.

    Shift and mass effect and brain compression
    Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2011 Page: 11 Effective with discharges: September 23, 2011

    Question:
    The patient suffered an acute subdural hematoma with shift and mass effect. We have been instructed by a consultant that shift and mass effect are clinically synonymous with brain compression and should be coded as such. Would it be appropriate to assign code 348.4, Compression of brain, based on the provider’s documentation of "mass effect or midline shift"?

    Answer:

    The coder should not make the assumption that midline shift or mass effect is synonymous with brain compression. The coder should query the provider and if the provider clarifies and documents that the "mass effect" or "midline shift" is brain compression, the coder may then assign a code for the brain compression.
  • Did we ever come to a consensus regarding brain *herniation* and traumatic ICH, which was part of Katy's original question? Because of course today I have that exact scenario. Pt has SDH due to trauma with documentation of brain compression and brain herniation. I would not take the brain compression alone, as it would code right back to the SDH, but working the term herniation through the encoder and on the alpha list takes me to 348.4 with no option for traumatic vs nontraumatic. So I am going to pick up that dx and hope it flies.

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • edited May 2016
    I ended up being confused by the end of the discussion.

    Donna Kent, RN, BSN, CCDS
    Manager, Clinical Documentation Integrity Program
    Clinical Quality and Accreditation
    Torrance Memorial Medical Center
    ph.:310 784-6884 fax:310 784-6899
    donna.kent@tmmc.com
  • edited May 2016
    The appropriate codes would be the traumatic SDH and brain herniation
    (348.4)
    based on the information provided of traumatic SDH with brain
    compression and herniation.

    I think the confusion previously was over traumatic vs nontraumatic SDH.
    If the only info available is SDH (subdural hematoma), it goes to
    traumatic.

    Sharon
  • I walked away from this conversation with this:

    You can not code Cerebral Compression with a traumatic ICH as it is inherent in the traumatic ICH code. BUT if the physcian specifically documents herniation, that would be coded.

    Hope I'm right!

    Katy
Sign In or Register to comment.