"Functional Quadriplegia"

I would like to educate our physicians on the use of "functional quadriplegia" as a diagnosis when a patient is dependent for ADL's. It would help if I could provide them with physician supported literature to support its use as an appropriate diagnosis.

Any suggestions?

Comments

  • edited May 2016
    According to the "Just Coding" article provided by HCPro at http://www.hcpro.com/HIM-240399-3288/Understand-the-complexity-of-coding-for-conditions-that-arent-named-in-documentation.html

    It is not really necessary for physicians to write "functional quadriplegia" for coders to code it as a diagnosis. The patient must meet the guidelines for someone who is functionally quadriplegic such as requiring total care, contractures all four limbs, total assist/bedbound, cognitively unable to participate in their care, or several other qualifiers.

    That being said, I also have undertaken physician education regarding the diagnosis of "functional quadriplegia". I believe that the medical record is most solid and irrefutable when we can get the physician to supply the diagnosis and it is not as strong when we have to infer a diagnosis in very limited circumstances such as this one.

    Cheers!

    Mark


    Mark N. Dominesey, RN, BSN, MBA, CCDS
    Sr. Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist
    Sibley Memorial Hospital
    W: 202.660.6782
    http://www.sibley.org
  • edited May 2016
    HI

    I tried to find a journal article as well -- but, couldn't (will
    continue quest when I have time and forward what I can find).

    But, the article Mark sent is what I use to reference, as well, when
    speaking w/ docs. Basically, (from my understanding) the individual does
    not have the mental ability to ambulate and functionally is the same as
    a paralyzed person.

    Good luck!
    Kara
  • edited May 2016
    I feel it necessary to clarify what I wrote earlier.

    This is a potential auditable diagnosis in the near future much like "Acute Respiratory Failure" is now. We should ALWAYS query the physician/LIP to get the diagnosis recorded in the medical record and not expect it to be coded without it being present in the record. My practice is just that. Physician education is key and we should not be introducing a new diagnosis, but getting them to name a condition that they are already treating. Education prior to our encounter for the record review is very important.

    Mark
  • Dr. Gold wrote about functional quadriplegia here:

    http://www.cditalk.com/content/257-You-Can’t-Get-Credit-for-Everyone’s-Trouble-without-Documenting-Its-Existence

    Renee


    Linda Renee Brown, RN, CCRN, CCDS
    Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist
    Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • Members of the ACDIS Advisory Board provide some insight in an Q&A that will be published in the January edition of the CDI Journal. E-mail me at mvarnavas@cdiassociation.com, Mark, and I'll explain further.
  • It has been my experience that it is difficult to reach this as a "final diagnosis" while following the 3M Coder/ICD-9 coding guidelines without specific documentation of "functional quadriplegia. That is what prompted my inquiry to ACDIS.

    The physician clearly described a patient completely dependent for all ADL's. With my nursing background I did not feel the final DRG reflected the demand that this patient put on the hospital staff nor the higher morbidity/mortality risk. This triggered my research of the MCC list for diagnoses that might support this type condition. Once I located this specific diagnosis I research it in detail and found that it described my patient perfectly.

    My goal was to reflect the patient's true SOI/ROM.

    Any suggestions on how to better address this while keeping all rules and regulations in check?


    Joan Fulmer
Sign In or Register to comment.