Diabetic ulcer vs Pressure ulcer (injury)
In ICD 9, we could code both a pressure ulcer & diabetic ulcer at the same site. With ICD 10, it didn't seem to be the case. Currently, there are several conditions that are automatically assumed as diabetic conditions/complications, including foot ulcers. Clinically, it is known that heel ulcers are commonly pressure ulcers in patients who may be bedbound.
In ICD 10, as CDI, is it considered leading to ask/query a physician to specify whether a heel ulcer is pressure vs non-pressure if they have either already called it a diabetic ulcer or if they just call it a heel ulcer, if an automatic link is already assumed?
Sorry if this has already been discussed, I did a quick search and didn't see any forum topic that already addressed this. Thanks for any input on this manner.
In ICD 10, as CDI, is it considered leading to ask/query a physician to specify whether a heel ulcer is pressure vs non-pressure if they have either already called it a diabetic ulcer or if they just call it a heel ulcer, if an automatic link is already assumed?
Sorry if this has already been discussed, I did a quick search and didn't see any forum topic that already addressed this. Thanks for any input on this manner.
Tagged:
Comments
Hello: I have not 'researched' this in Coding Clinic or the code books, but I'd agree it may be valid to query for a pressure ulcer in this situation since the location is the heel, a common site for a pressure ulcer. I've not seen an ulcer of this site stated as a diabetic manifestation given most diabetic foot ulcers are of the digits. I'd suggest you do search in your coding reference for ulcer of the heel as I recall AHA had a very good discussion of this topic.
Our coders feel that we should not query, (and they believe we are being leading by querying by asking " You documented a diabetic ulcer of the heel. Is the ulcer non-pressure vs pressure ulcer vs other?") especially when the doctor already called an ulcer a diabetic ulcer. due to:Under Section I, General Coding Guidelines, 14 on the ICD 10 coding guidelines (Documentation for BMI, Depth of NOn-pressure ulcers, pressure ulcer stages, coma scale, and NIH stroke scale),
at the end, it states, "If there is conflicting medical record documentation, either from the same clinician or other clinicians, the pt's attending provider should be queried for clarification."
However, under the coding handbook rules:
Endocrine, Nutritional, and Metabolic Diseases Complications and Manifestations of Diabetes Mellitus
Ulcers of the lower extremities, particularly the feet, are common complications of diabetes. The code for the diabetic foot ulcer complication (E08-E13 with .621) is assigned first, with an additional code of L97.4-, L97.5- indicating the specific site of the ulcer. If gangrene is present, code E08-E13 with .52 should be assigned as an additional code. It is important to recognize that not all ulcers in patients with diabetes are diabetic ulcers; if there is a question as to the relationship, the physician should be consulted. Other diabetic skin ulcers are coded to E08-E13 with .622 and an additional code to identify the site of the ulcer (L97.1-L97.9, L98.41-L98.49).
We(CDI) think we should be able to query the physician based on what I have highlighted and italicized above. Are we, as CDI, going out of our bounds to query when we feel that an ulcer may not be due to diabetes, but a different cause? (is there some rule against asking a provider when we believe their documentation is erroneous? We are both nurses here).
Welcome: Suggest you use the 'search' option and view Best Practice Guidelines for more references found there pertaining to confirmation of conditions (AHIMA/ACDIS Best Practice) - could be helpful. We have many, many, references and postings in the Library, and elsewhere citing references very helpful and germane. I'd send you a link, but am midst of large Sepsis review myself.
Paul Evans, RHIA, CCDS
I'd ask if we have a Wound Care nurse that may want to weight in on this issue - .
P. Evans RHIA